The Best Practices
For Seizing Electronic Evidence
Outline
Purpose
To develop a basic
understanding of key technical and legal factors regarding searching and
seizing electronic storage devices and media.
Introduction
Scope of the Problem
As computers and related storage and communication devices proliferate
in our society, so does the use of those devices in conducting criminal
activities. Technology is employed by criminals as a means of communication,
a tool for theft and extortion, and a repository to hide incriminating
evidence or contraband materials. Law enforcement officers must possess
up-to-date knowledge and equipment to effectively investigate today's
criminal activity. The law enforcement community is challenged by the
task of identifying, investigating and prosecuting individuals and organizations
that use these and other emerging technologies to support their illicit
operations.
Recognizing Potential
Evidence
Computers and digital
media are increasingly involved in unlawful activities. The computer may
be contraband, fruits of the crime, a tool of the offense, or a storage
container holding evidence of the offense. Investigation of any criminal
activity may produce electronic evidence. Computers and related evidence
range from the mainframe computer to the pocket-sized personal data assistant
to the floppy diskette, CD or the smallest electronic chip device. Images,
audio, text and other data on these media are easily altered or destroyed.
It is imperative that law enforcement officers recognize, protect, seize
and search such devices in accordance with applicable statutes, policies
and best practices and guidelines.
Answers to the following
questions will better determine the role of the computer in the crime:
- Is the computer
contraband of fruits of a crime?
For example, was the computer software or hardware stolen?
- Is the computer
system a tool of the offense?
For example, was the system actively used by the defendant to commit
the offense? Were fake IDs or other counterfeit documents prepared using
the computer, scanner, and color printer?
- Is the computer
system only incidental to the offense, i.e., being used to store evidence
of the offense?
For example, is a drug dealer maintaining his trafficking records in
his computer?
- Is the computer
system both instrumental to the offense and a storage device for evidence?
For example did the computer hacker use her computer to attack other
systems and also use it to store stolen credit card information?
Once the computer's
role is understood, the following essential questions should be answered:
- Is there probable
cause to seize hardware?
- Is there probable
cause to seize software?
- Is there probable
cause to seize data?
- Where will this
search be conducted?
- For example,
is it practical to search the computer system on site or must the
examination be conducted at a field office or lab?
- If law enforcement
officers remove the system from the premises to conduct the search,
must they return the computer system, or copies of the seized date,
to its owner/user before trial?
- Considering
the incredible storage capacities of computers, how will experts
search this data in an efficient, timely manner?
Preparing for the
Search and/or Seizure
Using evidence obtained
from a computer in a legal proceeding requires:
- Probable cause
for issuance of a warrant or an exception to the warrant requirement.
Caution: If you encounter potential evidence that may be outside the
scope of your existing warrant or legal authority, contact your agency's
legal advisor or prosecutor as an additional warrant may be necessary.
- Use of appropriate
collection techniques so as not to alter or destroy evidence.
- Forensic examination
of the system completed by trained personnel in a speedy fashion, with
expert testimony available at trial.
Conducting the Search
and/or Seizure
Once the computer's
role is understood and legal requirements are fulfilled:
- Secure the Scene
- Officer safety
is paramount.
- Preserve area
for potential fingerprints.
- Immediately
restrict access to computer(s).
Isolate from phone lines (because data on the computer can be access
remotely).
- Secure the Computer
as Evidence
- If computer
is "OFF", do not turn "ON".
- If computer
is "ON"
- Stand-alone
computer (non-networked)
- Consult
computer specialist
- If
specialist is not available
- Photograph
screen, then disconnect all power sources; unplug from
the wall AND the back of the computer.
- Place
evidence tape over each drive slot.
- Photograph/diagram
and label back of computer components with existing
connections.
- Label
all connectors/cable end to allow reassembly as needed.
- If
transport is required, package components and transport/store
components as fragile cargo.
- Keep
away from magnets, radio transmitters and otherwise
hostile environments.
- Networked
or business computers
- Consult
a Computer Specialist for further assistance
- Pulling
the plug could:
- Severely
damage the system
- Disrupt
legitimate business
- Create
officer and department liability
Other Electronic
Storage Devices
Electronic devices
may contain viable evidence associated with criminal activity. Unless
an emergency exists, the device should not be accessed. Should it be necessary
to access the device, all actions associated with the manipulation of
the device should be noted in order to document the chain of custody and
insure its admission in court.
- Wireless Telephones
- Potential Evidence
Contained in Wireless Devices
- Numbers
called
- Numbers
stored for speed dial
- Caller
ID for incoming calls
- Other information
contained in the memory of wireless telephones
- Phone/pager
numbers
- Names
and addresses
- PIN
numbers
- Voice
mail access number
- Voice
mail password
- Debit
card numbers
- Calling
card numbers
- E-mail/Internet
access information
- The
on screen image may contain other valuable information
- On/Off Rule
- If the
device is "ON", do NOT turn it "OFF".
- Turning
it "OFF" could activate lockout feature.
- Write
down all information on display (photograph if possible).
- Power
down prior to transport (take any power supply cords present).
- If the
device is "OFF", leave it "OFF".
- Turning
it on could alter evidence on device (same as computers).
- Upon
seizure get it to an expert as soon as possible or contact
local service provider.
- If
an expert is unavailable, USE A DIFFERENT TELEPHONE and
contact 1-800-LAWBUST (a 24:7 service provided by the cellular
telephone industry).
- Make
every effort to locate any instruction manuals pertaining
to the device.
- Electronic Paging
Devices
- Potential Evidence
Contained in Paging Devices
- Numeric
pagers (receives only numeric digits; can be used to communicate
numbers and code)
- Alpha numeric
pagers (receives numbers and letters and can carry full text)
- Voice Pagers
(can transmit voice communications (sometimes in addition to
alpha numeric)
- 2-way pagers
(containing incoming and outgoing messages)
- Best Practices
- Once
pager is no longer in proximity to suspect - turn it off.
Continued access to electron communication over pager without
proper authorization can be construed as unlawful interception
of electronic communication.
- Search
of stored contents of pager.
- Incident
to arrest
- With
probable cause + exception
- With
consent
- Facsimile Machines
- Fax machines
can contain:
- Speed dial
lists
- Stored
faxes (incoming and outgoing)
- Fax transmission
logs (incoming and outgoing)
- Header
line
- Clock setting
- Best practices
- If fax
machine is found "ON", powering down may cause loss of last
number dialed and/or stored faxes.
- Other Considerations
- Search
issues
- Record
telephone line number fax is plugged into
- Header
line should be the same as the phone line; user sets header
line.
- All
manuals should be seized with equipment, if possible.
- Caller ID Devices
- May contain
telephone and subscriber information from incoming telephone calls.
- Interruption
of the power supply to the device may cause loss of data if
not protected by internal battery backup.
- Document
all stored data prior to seizure or loss of data may occur.
- Smart Cards
A plastic card the size of a standard credit card that holds a microprocessor
(chip) which is capable of storing monetary value and other information.
- Awareness
- Physical
characteristics of the card
- Photograph
of the smart card
- Label
and identify characteristics.
- Features
similar to credit card/driver's license.
- Detect
possible alteration or tampering during same examination.
- Uses of Smart
Cards
- Point of
sale transactions
- Direct
exchange of value between cardholders
- Exchange
of value over the Internet
- ATM capabilities
- Capable
of storing other data and files similar to a computer
- Circumstances
Raising Suspicion Concerning Smart Cards
- Same as
credit cards
- Numerous
cards (different names or same issuing vendor)
- Signs of
tampering (cards can be found in the presence of computer or
other electronic devices)
- Questions to
Ask When Encountering Smart Cards
- Who is
card issued to (the valid cardholder)?
- Who issued
the card?
- What are
the uses of the cards?
- Why does
the person have numerous cards?
- Can this
computer or device alter the card?
- Other Considerations
- Smart Card
technology is used in some cellular phones and may be found
in or with cellular devices (see Wireless section)
Tracing an Internet
E-mail
- When an internet
e-mail message is sent, the user typically controls only the recipient
line(s) (To and Bcc) and the Subject line.
- Mail software adds
the rest of the header information as it is processed.
Reading an E-mail Header:
| |
|
----- Message header follows ----- |
| (1) |
Return-path: <ambottom@o167832.cc.nps.navy.mil> |
| (2) |
Received: from o167832.cc.army.mil by nps.navy.mil (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AAO868O; Thur, 7 Nov 96 17:51:49 PST |
| (3) |
Received: from localhost byo167832.navy.mil (4.1/SMI-4.1)
id AA16514; Thur 7 Nov 96 17:50:53 PST |
| (4) |
Message-ID: <9611080150.AA16514@o167832.cc.army.mil> |
| (5) |
Date: Thur, 7 Nov 1996 17:50:53 -0800 (PST) |
| (6) |
From: "M. Bottoms" <ambottomo167832.cc.nps.navy.mil> |
| (7) |
To: Tom Whitt <tom_whitt@tomwhitt.com> |
| (8) |
Cc: Real 3D <real3dQmmc.com>, Denis Adams <zzxxms@ldsa.com>,
Joe Arion <oerion@aol.com> |
|
- Line (1) tells
other computers who really sent the message and where to send error
messages (bounces and warning).
- Line (2) and (3)
show the route the message took from sending to delivery. Each computer
that receives this message adds a Received field with its complete address
and time stamp; this helps in tracking delivery problems.
- Line (4) is the
Message-ID, a unique identifier for this specific message. This
ID is logged, and can be traced through computers on the message route
if there is a need to track the mail.
- Line (5) shows
the date, time, and time zone when the message was sent.
- Line (6) tells
the name and e-mail address of the message originator (the "sender").
- Line (7) shows
the name and e-mail address of the primary recipient; the address may
be for a:
- mailing list,
- system-wide
alias,
- a personal
username.
- Line (8) lists
the names and e-mail addresses of the "courtesy copy" recipients of
the message. There may be "Bcc:" recipients as well; these "blind
carbon copy" recipients get copies of the message, but their names and
addresses are not visible in the headers.
About this Publication
The Best Practices
for Seizing Electronic Evidence was developed as a project of the
International Association of Chiefs facilitated Advisory Committee for
Police Investigative Operations. The Committee convened a working group
of a variety of law enforcement representatives, facilitated by the United
States Secret Service, to identify common issues encountered in today's
crime scenes. This manual was developed by representatives from the following
agencies:
- Alexandria, Virginia
Police Department
- Boston, Massachusetts
Police Department
- Baltimore County
Police Department
- Clarkstown, New
York Police Department
- Department of Justice
- Computer Crimes & Intellectual Property Section
- Florida Department
of Law Enforcement
- Florida Statewide
Prosecutors Office
- High Intensity
Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) Program
- Los Angeles County
District Attorneys Office
- Los Angeles Police
Department
- Lubbock, Texas
Police Department
- Maryland Heights,
Missouri Police Department
- National Association
of Attorneys General
- National Institute
of Justice
- National Sheriffs
Association
- New Jersey Division
of Criminal Justice
- New York City Police
Department
- New York County
District Attorneys Office
- New York State
Organized Crime Task Force
- Provo, Utah Police
Department
- Richardson, Texas
Police Department
- Rockland County
New York District Attorneys Office
- St. Louis County
Police Department
- United States Secret
Service
- Utah County Attorneys
Office
|